Review: Discovering Intertextual Parallels in Latin and Greek with Tesserae

By Julian Yolles | Mar 24, 2019

Gone will be the times whenever scholars of Ancient Greek and Latin literary works relied solely for a memory that is prodigious an imprinted library of traditional texts, commentaries, and guide works. Digitized texts and brand brand brand new tools for textual analysis supplement approaches that are traditional. These procedures don’t require a library that is physical in addition they vow to truly save some time to create new insights.

The Tesserae Project seeks to make the most of digital corpora to allow an individual to get connections between texts.

For instance, you could look for correspondences between Apuleius’ Apologia and a message of Cicero, measure the extent to which Apollonius of Rhodes observed Homeric diction, or recognize Juvenalian tendencies in Jerome’s letters. You could also compare Greek and Latin texts and examine, by way of example, how Sallust utilized Thucydides. While you can (whilst still being should) move to commentaries and specific studies, Tesserae performs an analysis that is focused of (sets of) texts, permitting the assessment of long-held scholarly presumptions in addition to recognition of the latest relationships. Furthermore, since some texts a part of Tesserae’s corpus have never gotten committed studies and commentaries, users can create insights that are entirely new.

The Search menu provides the individual the option to search in Latin (the standard), Greek, English texts, as well as in both Latin and Greek texts. The sheer number of Latin texts available (104, maybe not counting writers detailed more often than once) is one of substantial, including not merely classical authors but in addition a range that is impressive of traditional authors, and some (Early) contemporary numbers such as for example Melchior de Polignac and Francis Glass, writer of an earlier nineteenth-century biography of George Washington. Tesserae also provides a decent quantity of Greek writers (71), like the mainstays associated with traditional curriculum and a few very very very early Jewish (Flavius Josephus) and Christian authors ( e.g., Clement, Basil, Eusebius). The English search choice, labeled as “untested,” provides eight authors/texts, including Shakespeare, Swift, as well as the World English Bible.

Since the area on Sources explains, the corpus of texts is put together from a variety of electronic databases, like the Latin Library, The Perseus Project, DigilibLT, the Open Greek and Latin Project, Musisque Deoque, therefore the Corpus Scriptorum Latinorum. A summary of sources for every single text is provided, including, where available, information on the printing way to obtain the electronic text. The consumer must be aware that the texts have already been modified “by changing the markup” and also by making “superficial changes to orthography,” and so shouldn’t be cited as representations for the posted texts without dual checking.

The fundamental Search function permits the consumer to choose A source and a Target text. Supply represents the writing alluded to, Target the alluding text. This selection impacts just the purchase where the search engine results are presented, maybe perhaps not the search itself. The algorithm compares two texts for similarities, then displays the results in the selected order to give users the impression of priority or influence in other words. Choosing Tacitus’ Annals as supply and Sallust’s Catiline as Target only will cause Tesserae to make the outcomes within an order that is anachronistic nevertheless the matching passages would be the identical to if the purchase is reversed.

Choosing a writer populates another dropdown directory of games. There are numerous limitations in finding writers and texts. If one desired to find proof of Vergilian allusions within the works of Tertullian, as an example, an individual could be needed to perform split searches of all of the combinations in every one of the writers’ works. One cannot compare the entire corpus that is vergilian most of the works of Tertullian at the same time. Rather, Tesserae is made to perform more focused analyses, that could create results that are powerful.

To simply just simply take complete benefit of the features, you need to make use of the Advanced Re thaicupid desteği Re Re Search choice ( simply simply click “show advanced” on any search web page) and see the directions supplied. Users may then specify a selection of parameters, above all, whether to find by

• precise term (sequence)
• lemma (disregarding inflection or conjugation)
• semantic match (on the basis of the English dictionary headwords for the lemmata, hence including synonyms and words that are related
• lemma + match that is semantica combination associated with the previous two)
• noise (trigrams: i.e., any mix of three letters occurring both in texts will be flagged).

The consumer can filter the noise out and restriction the outcome, as an example by specifying how many stopwords, hence eliminating highest-frequency terms from outcomes. There are many different ways to fine-tune outcomes and also to modify your order for which these are generally shown. By standard, answers are purchased by the rating Tesserae assigns each communication (in decreasing order), in line with the regularity of uncommon terms. Furthermore, outcomes could be exported being a tab-separated .

Prashant Shaegokar

all author posts